WORKERS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!
FOR BOLSHEVISM
INSIDE THE COMMUNIST AND WORKERS’ MOVEMENT
ALL-UNION COMMUNIST PARTY OF BOLSHEVIKS (AUCPB) ВКПБ
FOR BOLSHEVISM-AUCPB website: http://aucpbenglishwebsite.blogspot.com or google in: for bolshevism-aucpb
No 06 (87) JUNE 2010
UNITED STATES’ NEW DOCTRINE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS
START-3 Treaty between the U.S. and Russia
At Prague, on 8 April 2010, the signatures of U.S. president and Russian president were solemnly delivered on a document with the provisional name of START-3. The Russian official side presents it as a "historic step" in US-Russian relations, as a measure, reinforcing global stability, as an outstanding victory in the Kremlin's foreign policy.
Under the new treaty between Russia and the United States, for 7 years they are committed to reducing the number of missiles and aircraft carrying nuclear weapons to the following levels: 700 units for deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and heavy bombers (TB) , 800 units for deployed and non launchers of ICBMs and SLBMs, as well as TB. Maximum number of nuclear warheads on missiles and aircraft carriers, is defined as 1550.
We remind that in 1991, at the time of the signing of the START-1, the Soviet Union had about 2,5 thousand nuclear weapon carriers and tens of thousands of warheads. That is, the reduction, compared with Soviet times, is on delivery means – by 3 times and on warheads – by 7 times.
From the article, by L.G. Ivashov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Colonel-General, "The agreement was signed. What's next?". Sov. Russia, № 37, April 10, 2010 (highlight in the article - Ed.):
Stopping the development of the U.S. missile defence system and building the arsenal of conventional precision strategic means has failed. The U.S. Congress during the negotiations passed a law which was clearly reported: reducing strategic offensive means, does not limit the deployment of defensive systems. Robert Gates at a specially convened press conference, said: "... Now, instead of several separate intercept missiles, it is about to create a system capable of neutralizing HUNDREDS of ballistic missiles that could fly from the territory of hostile states." Where hundreds of missiles can fly from is not worth the guess: only from Russia. "
"Let's try to gain insight into the changes in American military and political strategy. In 2002, George W. Bush creates a commission to prepare a “nuclear review." The commission's report concludes:
- The new Russia is no longer a serious nuclear threat to the U.S.;
- American strategic nuclear weapons is not an effective means of political strategy to U.S. security, it can not protect America from terrorist threats, does not serve the purposes of applying pressure on "rogue" States;
- Maintaining the strategic nuclear forces requires significant financial expenses, not answering the criteria of "efficiency - cost".
"As a result of heated discussions over the nuclear review, a decision is taken to reduce the cost of the maintenance and development of strategic nuclear forces and increase spending on the development of a new generation conventional means. As a compromise with supporters of nuclear weapons and those who see in Russia and China a nuclear threat, a decision is taken to withdraw from the ABM Treaty-72 and to deploy a global anti-missile system. In 2003, Bush argues concept of "rapid global strike" and the U.S. officially withdrew from the ABM -72 Treaty. A U.S. command main strike is formed, and into its planned composition will be transferred 450 units of the strategic nuclear forces, to modernize them into high-precision means of delivery with conventional warheads. At the same time, work is intensifying on the creation of strategic cruise missiles of a new class (range up to 6000 km, speed - 6 Machs, Mach 1 is equal to the speed of sound, ed.). A large-scale deployment program of 1400 objects of strategic missile defence is underway. The concept of “rapid global strike" (RGS) requires application of a powerful concentrated attack by several thousand precision strike means on a state-target within 2-4 hours, the destruction of vital installations, defining the strategic stability of the state, and forcing it to surrender. So the pragmatists-Americans have come to a rational conclusion: Why spend big money on weapons that can not be applied (on the strength of retaliation and radioactive contamination of large areas). The problem of Yugoslavia and Iraq were decided not by nuclear but by conventional means of destruction.) And the crucial role it played in the operations of high-precision cruise missiles and bombs. Implementing the concept of RGS allows Americans to break away in military-technical terms from all other countries in the world and become a global military monopoly. That is, to becoming a force dictator of the modern world. In any case, the United States are insured against a retaliatory strike by Russia and China, by the deployment of strategic ABM systems. To reduce the cost of addressing the aforementioned problems, the administration of Barack Obama spins the "dove" anti-nuclear program. In order to force a new political strategy, security, and more accurate to call it a policy of absolute impunity, the United States is rapidly increasing military spending, turning NATO into a global policeman. And in parallel talks about a general nuclear-free world.
"With regard to the START-3, then it logically fits into the new U.S. nuclear doctrine. Does Russia need the treaty? In an environment where senior officials have turned into a class of owners-oligarchs and stores by 'back-breaking toil" earned capital in the West, the government will not aim missiles at banks where their money is kept in the territory where property is purchased. Therefore, as soon as Barack Obama put forward the idea of a new START Treaty, the Kremlin, without a moment's hesitation, grabbed it and even put forward a counter-plan: to reduce by more than a third Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenal (608 carriers capable of carrying about 2700 nuclear warheads).”
From an article by political analyst Vyacheslav TETEKINA "Another seven years of disarmament ... Our comment. Soviet Russia, № 37, April 10, 2010:
"The stumbling block in negotiations was the U.S. intention to create a global missile defence system (MDS). It is no secret that the U.S. missile defence system is primarily designed to completely annul the strategic nuclear potential of Russia. During the talks, the Russian side insisted that issues of strategic offensive weapons and missile defence be linked. Simply put, the Americans sought agreement to cease its missile defence program. As a result, the missile defence system in the text of the agreement is mentioned, but in such a way that allows both sides to interpret the reference in its own way. The Kremlin argue that we have achieved alignment. The Americans made it clear that this mention, in no way commits. Therefore, the President of Russia accompanied the signing of the treaty with a special statement that it could "act and be viable only in circumstances where there is no qualitative and quantitative development of opportunities for U.S. missile defence systems." Sergey Lavrov head of Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spoke on this point more clearly. He warned the U.S. that Russia reserves the right to withdraw from the treaty if it considers that an American missile had threatened Russia. However, the American anti-missile train, despite verbal protests of the Russian elite, has already raced ahead at full steam. The U.S. is deploying its missile defence system, potentially capable to bring down more missiles than Russia might have according to START-3. Obama reportedly made some concessions, reversing the decision of President George W. Bush to deploy missile defence bases in Poland and Czech Republic. But recently, Romania and Bulgaria "suddenly" stated that by 2015 they will place these bases on their territory. Also Poland still makes claims to this "honour". Meanwhile, Republicans in the Senate argued that ratification is unlikely, if the treaty will contain legally binding language on the linkage between offensive weapons and missile defence. There is no such language in the draft treaty. Although the relationship of START and the ABM are recognized. As noted by one of the Western newspapers "At the last minute, the text of the agreement still includes a few words about defence, as handouts to the Russians, but the Deputy Secretary of State Ellen Tauscher immediately hastened to emphasize that there will be no "restrictions" in the deployment of interceptor missiles". Here is the quintessence of the American position? And threatening statements by Medvedev and Lavrov are calmly ignored by their counterparts in the U.S.. This has happened more than once! "
"The second factor, which Russian leaders and court "political scientists" obviously will not advertise, is that a reduction would not include air, cruise missiles and sea-based. Namely, they, in the nuclear and non-nuclear equipment increasingly constitute the main striking force of the American army. It was cruise missiles used for 78 days in the "contactless" war (ie, without the entry of NATO troops onto the territory of Yugoslavia) which defeated this country, which had one of the most powerful armies in Europe. According to some reports, the U.S. could strike a blow to the intensity of launches equal to a thousand cruise missiles a day. You can imagine what a huge threat these precision weapons pose to Russia with its completely destroyed air defence system. So the U.S. for the first time get a chance to safely "cover" their strategic nuclear potential with an ABM system and an arsenal of cruise missiles, acting in conjunction with the jamming of control systems.
"Last December, the Republicans warned they will not ratify the treaty on strategic offensive arms while Obama does not promise to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal, that is, not to adopt the supported by Republicans plan to create a new generation of nuclear weapons. Therefore, leaders of the Obama administration soothe their right wingers, arguing that the new treaty does not hinder the continuation of work on the missile defence project and precision non-nuclear strategic strike weapons. The treaty "ensures our ability to develop a global non-nuclear strike means" - Said the chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen. U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates said that "the reductions stipulated in this treaty will not affect our nuclear triad, and the document also does not limit the plans to defend the U.S. and its allies through the refinement and deployment of antimissile systems. Moreover, several hundred launchers for ICBMs, which the U.S. will have to reduce, can be turned into non-nuclear weapons.
"We must bear in mind that the START reduction is occurring in conditions of vast superiority of America over Russia in Conventional Forces, and the collapse of the Russian Army during the "military reforms" undertaken by Russia’s Minister for Disarmament, Serdyukov. Our newspaper has published a number of materials showing the deplorable condition of the Ground Forces, Air Force and Navy. But the U.S. is intensifying the power of namely its conventional armed forces.
"Next. The fact is that the Americans warhead reductions are not destroying the missiles, but instead are being sent to warehouses. Bringing them back to the platform of launch vehicles is not particularly difficult, so a reduction of their nuclear weapons are conditional in character. The treaty specifies only the number of deployed warheads, while the number of warheads, missiles and bombers in the warehouses is not limited by the document".
"The following circumstance. Negotiations are conducted as if the world has only two nuclear powers - the United States and Russia. However, as noted in an interview by Y.A. Kvitsinsky, "the treaty as before should still not consider the nuclear weapons of US allies to NATO - Britain and France, and countries such as Israel or Pakistan. But as a result of reductions in Russia's nuclear potential it becomes more comparable to the nuclear capability of some of those other countries.
"The U.S. now have absolute superiority in nuclear and conventional arms over any potential adversary or even a group of opponents. Their military budget - and this in a supposedly extinct Cold War - already exceeds 400 billion dollars. They openly seek to achieve absolute superiority not only on land and at sea, but also in space".
PERSONAL AND SECRET MESSAGE FROM PREMIER J.V. STALIN TO PRIME MINISTER, Mr W. CHURCHILL AND PRESIDENT Mr. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT
The behaviour of the Polish Government in relation to the USSR in recent years the Soviet Government considers absolutely outlandish, violating all rules and norms in relation between the allied states.
The anti-Soviet slander campaign launched by the Nazis about the Polish officers who they themselves murdered in the area of Smolensk, on territory occupied by German troops, has been immediately seized by the Government of Sikorsky and strongly fueled by the Polish official press. The government of Sikorsky not only failed to counter the infamous Nazi defamation of the Soviet Union, but did not even bother to apply to the Soviet Government with any questions or clarification on this matter.
The Nazi government having perpetrated a monstrous crime against the Polish officers, the farcical investigation, a dramatization of which they have used some Polish pro-fascist elements chosen by themselves in occupied Poland, where everything is under the thumb of Hitler and the honest Pole is unable to open his own mouth.
For the "investigation", the International Red Cross have been involved by the Sikorski Government as well as the Hitler Government, which is forced in a situation of a terrorist regime, with its gallows and the mass extermination of the civilian population, to take part in this investigation comedy, directed by Hitler. Clearly, this "investigation" being carried out behind the back of the Soviet Government can not inspire confidence in any honest people.
The fact that the hostile campaign against the Soviet Union launched simultaneously in the German and Polish press, and being in the same plan – this circumstance leaves no doubt that among the enemy allies - Hitler and the Sikorski government there is contact and collusion in the carrying out of this hostile campaign.
Whereas the peoples of the Soviet Union, bleeding in heavy combat with Nazi Germany and bending forces to defeat the common enemy of freedom-loving democracies, the Sikorski government to the benefit of the Hitler tyranny is dealing a treacherous blow to the Soviet Union.
These circumstances compel the Soviet Government to recognize that the present Government of Poland, having descended to a deal with Hitler's government, in practice, has ended partnership relations with the USSR and has adopted a hostile attitude toward the Soviet Union.
On the basis of all this, the Soviet Government has found it necessary to break off relations with this government.
I think it necessary to inform you of the foregoing, and I hope that ... * understand the need for this forced step of the Soviet government.
April 21, 1943
* Note. Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt had been sent the message with the same text, but in the last paragraph, where the ellipsis is, in the message to Winston Churchill it states "the British Government" and in the message to Franklin D. Roosevelt - "The U.S. Government". (Correspondence of the Chairman of the Soviet of Ministers of the USSR with the U.S. President and the Prime Minister of Great Britain during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. Moscow, 1957. V.1, P.119-120, vol.2, p.59-60.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
KATYN: A FALSIFICATION BY ANTI-SOVIETS
Since last year, the Russian government has allocated a lot of significance to the 65-th anniversary of Victory over fascism in the Great Patriotic War (WW II) in the USSR. From the mouth of the rulers of all levels has sounded the theme of care for veterans in the form of improved living conditions and so forth. Periodically flashed memories of veterans, mostly to the domestic plan. It seemed that the closer to the day of Victory, the more they will speak about the heroism of the people, who cut off the head of fascism and liberated half of Europe from fascism – and about the Soviet people!
Whatever! The Russian and Polish authorities planned early, and it was amazingly coordinated. They began to spit upon the Soviet people. They financed the lying, dirty film by Andzej Wajda. They agreed the coven near Smolensk of the "democratic" presidents of Russia and Poland with a large retinue. And when on April 10 flying into the Katyn forest, the Polish President Lech Kaczynski was killed in a plane crash near Smolensk, there was nothing left for the Russian "democrats" other than to join the general lament about the Polish president, "the favorite" of the Poles. On April 18, President of Russia D.A. Medvedev in Krakow at the funeral of Kaczynski accused Stalin personally in the organization of the mass killings in the Katyn forest. Then he started talking about Katyn during his visit to the Scandinavian countries. On April 28 at a press conference in Copenhagen, Medvedev reiterated his accusations against Soviet power.
Why did the events 67 years ago in Katyn overshadow the approaching 65-year anniversary of Victory?
We'll have to plunge into history.
The first news reports of the deaths of Polish officers in Katyn forest came from Hitler's Germany, on April 13, 1943.
Back on 9 April, the Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary: "Near Smolensk were found mass graves of Poles. The Bolsheviks simply shot and then buried in mass graves around 10 thousand Polish prisoners of war, among whom were civilians, priests, intellectuals, artists, etc. I have taken steps to ensure that journalists from neutral countries visit by the Polish mass graves. I have also taken steps to bring representatives of the Polish intelligentsia to the graves. They themselves will be able to see what awaits them if they realize their desire and the Germans are defeated by the Bolsheviks.”
It is in the last phrase of this fascist that there lies the true purpose of Goebbels's propaganda - to intimidate the Poles, to sow discord between the Polish and Soviet peoples and not allow the Poles to join in alliance with the Soviet Union.
Then the Soviet-Polish relations were extremely strained. The reason - the uncompromising anti-Sovietism and outspoken Russophobia pushed the Polish bourgeois government to undermine a system of collective security in Europe, which finally freed the hands of the Nazis in carrying out their plans for the destruction of Slavic civilization. By the end of 1939 the Germans in occupied Poland had killed over 100 thousand people. Such was the German "new order". By the end of the occupation of Poland, the Germans had killed about 6 million Poles - 22% of the population! The ultimate goal of the Nazis - the elimination of all the Polish people by 1950. Fortunately for the Poles, there was the USSR and its Red Army.
The need to unite efforts of the Soviet and Polish peoples in the struggle against fascism gradually began to come to the Polish emigration. In London, bourgeois government had settled. On July 30, 1941 diplomatic relations were resumed between the British and the government of the USSR. The agreement provided for the establishment in the Soviet Union of the Polish army from among the former Polish soldiers and officers who have been held captive after the liberation of Western Ukraine and Western Belorussia by the Red Army.
On 25 December 1941, the Soviet government adopted a decree "On the Polish Army on Soviet territory." It was reported that there were 96 thousand people in it. It was commanded by General Anders.
However, the Poles considered themselves poorly equipped in the USSR and by September 1942, 80,000 Polish soldiers had left for Iran, to the Allies, and began to protect British oil fields. Only in 1944 they appeared in Italy.
But already in March 1943, the created Union of Polish patriots formed the Polish Tadeusz Kosciuszko division led by General Z. Burlingham. The division adopted a baptism of fire in the battles around Lenino on 12-13 October 1943. After that, the division grew into the Polish troops.
The fascists sensed strengthening friendship between peoples, and their impending defeat. It was then (April 13, 1943) the German message thundered out...
On April 19, 1943 “Pravda” published an article entitled "Hitler’s Polish officers”, in which examples were given of how the Nazis committed mass murder which they often passed off as signs of "Bolshevik terror" and said: "It has now become clear, the Germans captured former Polish prisoners of war in 1941 in the areas west of Smolensk in construction work and caught together with many Soviet citizens, residents of the Smolensk region and into the hands of Nazi executioners in the summer of 1941, after the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the region of Smolensk. The Germans brutally murdered former Polish prisoners of war and many Soviet people, and now they want to hide traces of their crimes and, in the hope that there are gullible people who believe it, try to cover up their heinous crimes with another portion of vile lies."
The "executioners" of the Poles near Katyn were called by Nazi propaganda "GPU commissars” Lev Rybak, Avraam Borisovich, Pavlo Brodinsky and Khaim Finberg. So far, no one has ever found a trace of the mysterious "commissars". Because there were never any in the first place.
This is True history.
Do the leaders of Poland and Russia not know this? Yes, they do know. Or are they just "gullible people"? Why then the "Katyn" show? They hated socialism and everything is done to discredit the Soviet people, and its leading force - the Bolshevik Party, headed by Stalin. An army and people without a leadership is just a crowd. And a crowd cannot win the battle with a powerful and treacherous enemy like German fascism. Hence, the strength was with the Bolsheviks and the socialist system! All this is hated by the latter-day "masters" of factories, newspapers, steamships of Russia and Poland and want to erase it from the minds of people. To do this, they have organized tokenistic suffering from "the victims of totalitarianism." And the Russian presidents keep repenting and repenting...
The Soviet people have nothing to repent.
During the notorious perestroika "gorbostroyka", Polish President V. Jaruzelski on the basis of Polish historians reiterated that the tragedy at Katyn – was an atrocity of German fascists, a provocation organized by the Nazis. And the anti-Soviet provocation, barely begun, grew quiet. But only for a time. After the bourgeois counter-revolutionary coup in the Soviet Union 1991-1993, the "Democrats” once again raised a wave of slander ...
In 1992, inside the archives of the Russian President was "accidentally" discovered "classified package № 1", which was supposedly the decision of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) on March 5, 1940, a letter from Beria to Stalin, a letter of 3 March, 1959 to Khrushchev from Shelepin etc ., and immediately declared "irrefutable" evidence of guilt of the USSR. However, the original documents have never been available for study. Studies made by many diligent historians and experts have already proven that they, like many other "documents" from the archives of the President – are fakes.
In 1943, a Commission was set up to establish and to investigate the shooting by the German fascist invaders in the Katyn forest, of Polish officers prisoners of war. The commission was headed by the President of the Academy of Medical Sciences Nikolai Pavlovich Burdenko. Members of the commission were writers, clerics and public figures. Evidence was obtained that prior to the arrival of the Germans in Katyn forest, there were Polish prisoners of war camps, and that the death of the Polish prisoners of war occurred in 1941, not 1940 as claimed by the Nazis. The Commission Report was published in Pravda on January 26, 1944, which stated:
"... 2. In the Katyn Forest in autumn 1941, mass shootings of Polish prisoners of war were carried out by the German occupation authorities...;
... 4. Due to the deterioration for Germany of the overall military and political situation to the beginning of 1943, the German occupation authorities for purposes of provocation took some action to ensure that their own misdeeds were ascribed to the Soviet authorities calculating for a quarrel between Russians and Poles."
Added to all this, the international experts directed by the Germans into occupied Smolensk, although they acted on orders from Hitler, found in the bodies of the slain, German bullets with marking "Gezo, Series" D ", caliber 7.65 mm. On May 8, 1943 Goebbels bitterly noted: "Unfortunately, in the Katyn graves, German ammunition were discovered.” Such facts of the execution of Poles by the German-fascist thugs is complete. After the war, Polish historians studied this tragedy and also did not find links with the "totalitarian regime". The issue was solved by both parties clearly – the Germans must repent.
The anti-Soviets together with the Zabugorny owners can not cope with the growing attraction of people to the stability of the Soviet period, to Stalin, that's why they suck into the dirty anti-Stalinist "crusade" campaign anything more or less suitable. The evil, ill-concealed behind a mask of "freedom" and "historical truth" anti-Sovietism is moved by the top echelons of power in Russia and Poland. More than 600 thousand (!) Soviet soldiers gave their lives for the liberation of Poland from the Nazis. But the Russian and Polish presidents are keeping quiet, like keeping quiet about the mass destruction by the Polish of Red Army soldiers in 1921 (after an unsuccessful counter-campaign of the Red Army into Warsaw, in Polish concentration camps died 60 thousand out of 130 thousand Russian prisoners of war). Even on special days of rememberence "our" presidents to not visit on the celebration of the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk or the liberation of Warsaw. But to celebrate the opening of a second front in Europe they flocked like flies to honey. Why do the thousands of Poles who died at Katyn cause a sea of outpourings?
People call it a betrayal.
The cynical and brazen lie about Katyn by the bourgeois "truth-lovers" is designed for the limited philistine and ignorance of the history by youth, primarily. Such an approach is typical of bourgeois propaganda. In part such poison in the minds of society has succeeded. But myths inevitably collapse, and for blasphemy over History, for the betrayal of the Soviet people will have to pay. The Supreme Court – the working people’s Court in a restored Soviet Union - will make its own verdict.
M. Dumov
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ABOUT RECENT EVENTS IN KIRGYSTAN
In Kyrgyzstan, the strongest emotion erupted, which led to the fall of the regime of Kurmanbek Bakiyev. The unrest began to develop rapidly across the country after the events of 6 - 7 April in Talas, where more than 10 thousand people gathered in the city centre, stormed the police department and the regional administration building, where the governor had taken refuge.
On April 7 began a true battle in the capital of Kyrgyzstan - Bishkek, where demonstrators stormed the White House. The standoff reached unprecedented proportions, which was a surprise even for the opposition. The rebels armed with pump action shotguns, clubs, shields and other riot equipment taken from the police and riot police, smashed the weapon shops, stormed and besieged the White House, smashed and burned the building of the General Prosecutor's Office, and seized the central television. The total number of victims - more than 1600 people wounded (mostly from firearms), and more than 80 people died.
The action against the Bakiyev clan was planned in advance by the "discounted" opposition (the former "associates" of Bakiyev in the "Tulip Revolution" in 2005, and then excluded by him from power, and thus - from lucrative property), even though it did not expect such a scale of confrontation. The unrest was fuelled by dissatisfaction by ordinary people due to increased by 2-4 times in 2010 tariffs on utilities, electricity, water and heating, and "privatization" by the Bakiyev clan of strategically important industrial projects of the country. A ban on the popular kurultae, which were scheduled for April 7, and the arrest of opposition leaders, were only a pretext for the unrest.
The wealth of the Bakiyev clan was more than the wealth of the deposed in 2005, Akayev. The 35-year-old president's son Maxim Bakiev became the richest man in the Kyrgyz Republic, who headed the Central Agency for Development, Investment and Innovation. All the country's finances passed through this agency, and many called it the "shadow government", which in contrast to the official government had real power. Maxim Bakiyev, to take in hand or placed under his control all the financial institutions in the country and the lion's share of the economy of Kyrgyzstan (with the help of his closest advisers to the agency - the largest Jewish oligarchs - Adviser of the U.S. Yevgeny Gurevich, Mikhail Nadel of the MGN Group and others).
As a result of the coup, the "opposition" came to power. The names of the leaders of the opposition, having "vectored over the dictator Bakiyev as in 2010, and in 2005 – are almost identical... The opposition leaders formed a "government of national confidence" led by "social democrat" Rosa Otunbayeva, which stated that it would operate for six months, until new presidential and parliamentary elections. Army and intelligence services have already sworn allegiance to the new regime and are bringing "order" in the country. The new government promises to reduce tariffs for utilities and return to "state" the privatized by the Bakiyev clan strategically important objects of the country (in order to proceed with carving them up).
In Kyrgyzstan, there is an ongoing struggle between bourgeois clans, obligingly bowing to their masters - the U.S., for the redistribution of power and property on the blood of the people. The people once again, as in 2005, will be deceived by the opposition hypocritically claiming to defend "the interests of the people", but really who are concerned about the redistribution of property in their own interests.
Having fled to the south of the country, Bakiyev, hoping for support from the West, made a statement that he would not cease give up his "presidential powers". However, the U.S. and Western Europe, for decoration, "condemning" the violence is already prepared to "recognize" the new government "(they also planted in the power). The U.S. will not easily forget the "hasty" decisions by Bakiyev on the elimination of the American military base in Manas (but he had only to threaten the U.S. with his finger, and this decision was immediately withdrawn and the base was "reassigned" to a centre of transit). Then Bakiyev flew down from the throne "... The “opposition” which came to power has already declared through Rosa Otunbayeva (which, according to media reports, also has close ties with the Jewish oligarchs, located in Israel) that "The Provisional Government of Kyrgyzstan intends to extend the lease with the U.S. military base at Manas airport outside Bishkek after it expires in July". Washington did not hesitate to answer. "I am optimistic about the steps of the Provisional Government, which it has already taken, - said U.S. vice secretary for South and Central Asia, Robert Blake. – The U.S. ready to help.
The leaders of the 'opposition' will never go against their Western masters and will not allow the justified anger of the people's anger to go beyond the capitalist system and "Western liberal democracy." The "social measures" undertaken by the new government - is a way to reassure people, to bring down popular protests. Liberation of the working people of Kyrgyzstan from poverty and slavery, as well as workers in other countries of former USSR, is possible only through the elimination of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and the transfer of stolen property into public property, on the path towards reviving Soviet poweer and the restoration of fraternal cooperation and friendship with all nations of the former USSR!
Down with bourgeois power!
All power - into the hands of the working people!
A. Deninsyuk
STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE USA AND UKRAINE
WASHINGTON, April 12. Itar-Tass. Barack Obama and Viktor Yanukovych confirmed their strategic partnership between the U.S. and Ukraine and expressed their intention to fully realize its potential. This is stated in a joint statement the two leaders released by the White House on the results of the meeting. It took place at the summit on nuclear safety. Obama and Yanukovych agreed that in their relations, both sides will rely on the United States-Ukraine Charter and the Commission on Strategic Partnership. "Both leaders acknowledged that their common interests and shared values are reflected in the Charter - this is democracy, economic freedom and prosperity, security and territorial integrity, energy security, military cooperation, the rule of law and human contacts" – the statement said.
VYACHESLAV MIKHAILOVICH MOLOTOV
120-th anniversary
Vycheslav Mikhailovich Molotov (Skryabin) – was a Bolshevik, the leading organizer of building socialism in the Soviet Union, a close associate of Stalin, and a talented diplomat, Marxist theoretician.
Molotov was born on March 9, 1890 in the settlement of Kukarka Vyatskaya province in the family of a shop clerk.
Molotov’s revolutionary activity began in 1906, when he joined the Social Democratic Party (Bolshevik) organization in Kazan. Arrested and exiled in April 1909 to Vologda, Molotov conducted in 1910 - 1911 underground work among railroad workers of Vologda, and restored the Vologda party organization. In these years, Molotov became a professional revolutionary, and studied Marxism in-depth.
After exile, from 1912 Molotov launched extensive work among the students in St. Petersburg, working in the Bolshevik newspaper "The Star" (Zvyezda). Molotov became a member of the editorial board of Pravda, met with Stalin, who guided the creation of St. Petersburg Pravda, and as secretary of the editorial board carried on a lot of correspondence with Lenin.
Molotov was a member of the St. Petersburg Committee of the Bolsheviks and took an active part in the election campaign into IV State Duma. During this period, Molotov had repeatedly been arrested.
Shortly after the outbreak of World War I, Molotov was sent to Moscow where he was working hard to restore the Bolshevik organization defeated by the tsarist secret police in the beginning of the war.
In the fall of 1916, Molotov on the orders of Lenin's co-opted into the Russian Bureau of the Central Committee of the Bolsheviks.
During the February bourgeois-democratic revolution, and then throughout the subsequent work in Petrograd, Molotov was a member of the Petrograd Committee of RSDLP (b) (Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (Bolshevik) and the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Soviet of Workers' Deputies. Molotov supervised the restoring of "Pravda" and before the return of Stalin from exile in Siberia, was one of its chief editors.
Molotov was a delegate of the April Party conference and the VI Party Congress, and actively supported the Leninist line of the socialist revolution.
During the preparation and during the October Revolution, Molotov was member of the Petrograd Military Revolutionary Committee, one of the leaders of the Bolsheviks in Petrograd, working under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin.
After the October Revolution, Molotov held the responsibility of economic and political work.
At the IX Congress of the RCP (B) (Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks), Molotov was elected candidate member of the Party Central Committee. In November 1920, Molotov was Secretary of the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Ukraine.
At the X Party Congress in March 1921, Molotov on the proposal of Lenin was elected a member and executive secretary of the RCP (b), as well as a candidate member of the Politburo.
Since then, Molotov worked in Moscow, participating in the entire leadership of Party and Soviet state, steadfastly defending the Leninist party line in the struggle against Trotskyism and other petty-bourgeois groups and trends.
After Lenin's death, in the number of other prominent figures of the party, Molotov entered the leadership core of the party, which rallied around Stalin and defeated of Trotskyism and the rightist deviation.
Since January 1926, after the XIV Congress of the Party, Molotov was a member of the Politburo of the CPSU (b) (All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks). Over the years, Molotov was also a member of the Executive Committee of the Comintern. In 1927 Molotov wasa member of the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee, in 1929 – a Member of the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR. Since mid-1928, Molotov was Secretary of the Moscow committee of the AUCPB in combination with the work of the Secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB.
From December 19, 1930, Molotov was chairman of the People's Commissars of the USSR.
Molotov, led by Stalin steadfastly pursued the Leninist policy of building socialism in the USSR. Molotov was the leading organizer of socialist construction in the USSR, and spoke at the XVII (1934) and XVIII (1939) Congresses of the CPSU (b) with reports on the second and third five-year economic development plans of the USSR.
At the February-March Plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) (1937) Molotov spoke on "Lessons of sabotage, subversion and espionage of the Japanese-German-Trotskyite agents.
In the aggravated international situation, in May 1939, Molotov was appointed People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR, and from May 1941 - First Deputy Chairman of People's Commissars of the USSR.
Molotov focused on foreign policy and actively participated in all diplomatic steps of the Soviet government before, during and in the first years after World War II.
In the summer of 1939, Molotov was involved in the Anglo-Franco-Soviet negotiations in Moscow, which were disrupted by the fault of England and France.
On August 23, 1939 Molotov signed the Germanic-Soviet non-aggression pact (agreement) (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), which prevented Anglo-American imperialists setting Germany against the USSR and laid the foundation for the formation of a future unified anti-Hitler coalition, headed by the Soviet Union.
During the Great Patriotic War of 1941 – 1945, Molotov was Deputy Chairman of the State Committee for Defence of J.V. Stalin, and member of the Supreme Command.
On June 22, 1941 Molotov on behalf of JV Stalin spoke on the radio with a message about the treacherous Nazi attack on the Soviet Union.
In June 1941, Molotov signed with the British Ambassador an agreement on joint action in the war against Germany. On September 29 - October 1, 1941, Molotov led the Soviet delegation at the Moscow conference of representatives of the USSR, Britain and the United States, which agreed on the issues of military supplies of the USSR.
In the period of evacuation in October 1941, of the People's Commissariat of Foreign Affairs of the USSR to Kuibyshev, Molotov, along with Stalin remained in Moscow.
In late May - early June 1942, Molotov visited Britain and the United States, having flown a dangerous flight across the front line, and signed with the governments of these countries, agreements on cooperation and mutual assistance.
Molotov was a close associate of Stalin at the Teheran (1943), Yalta (1945) and Potsdam (1945) conferences, which laid the foundations of postwar peace settlement.
Molotov during the war, led the work on equipping the Red Army with tanks and the development of the tank industry. In September 1943, for great success in this field, Molotov was awarded the title Hero of Socialist Labour.
In the early postwar years, Molotov led the Soviet delegation in the UN, at the sessions of the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, the United States, Britain, France and China, and the Paris Peace Conference in 1946
In March 1949, Molotov was relieved of his duties as Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, focusing on the work of the Soviet Government as the first deputy chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR.
At the XIX Congress of the Party (1952) Molotov was elected a member of the CPSU Central Committee and member of the Plenum of the CPSU Central Committee Presidium.
Molotov, during entire period of his activity was more than once instructed to speak with the guidance papers on questions of party building, socialist industrialization of the country, on the village and the collectivization of agriculture, Soviet construction, on the national question, and on the international policy of the Soviet Union.
After the death of Stalin, Molotov, unfortunately, did not stand on firm Bolshevik positions and made a number of serious political mistakes.
Molotov, supported Khrushchev on the question of Lavrenty Pavlovich Beria, who was executed without trial and investigation of physical violence. Molotov, though he differs from Khrushchev's position on the assessment of Stalin and his whole period of activity, in essence he endorsed the report of Khrushchev's "On the personality cult" of Stalin at the XX Party Congress (1956), not opposing this report for the sake of an imaginary "party unity".
The murder of L. Beria and the approval by the Congress of the report on the “cult of personality" of Stalin strengthened the position of Khrushchev, which allowed him to organize behind the Presidium of the CC and then with Trotskyite methods, using the apparatus of intrigue and manipulation, the removal of virtually all the party leadership (Molotov, Kaganovich , Voroshilov, Bulganin, Saburov Pervukhin and others). The neo-trotskyist Khrushchev group came to power, which led the USSR and the whole camp of socialism onto the path of capitalist restoration.
In May 1956, at the proposal of Khrushchev, Molotov was removed from his post as Soviet foreign minister for alleged wrong policy towards Tito's Yugoslavia.
At the June Central Committee Plenum (1957) Molotov, for belonging to the “anti-Party group" (although the anti-Party plot was woven by Khrushchev and his comrades behind the Presidium of the CC) was removed from the CPSU Central Committee and the Presidium of the Central Committee and removed from the post of first deputy chairman of USSR Council of Ministers.
In February 1962, Molotov was expelled from the Communist Party for "anti-Party factional activities and active participation in mass repression.”
After the expulsion from the CPSU, Molotov did not cease to engage in social activities, constantly working at home or in the library, following the events in the world and in his own country the USSR, and responded to these events by writing notes to the Central Committee of the CPSU.
In July 1984, Molotov was restored to the ranks of the opportunist Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU).
Molotov was awarded four Orders of Lenin and four medals: "For the Defence of Moscow", "For Victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945." "For Valiant Labour in the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945" and "In Memory of the 800-th Anniversary of Moscow ".
Molotov died at 97 years old in Moscow on November 8, 1986. After the death of Molotov, writer F. Chuyev published his memoirs "One hundred and forty conversations with Molotov."
Thanks to J.V. Stalin, Molotov rose to the level of leading head of the Soviet state and Communist Party, making a huge contribution to the cause of building socialism in our country, to the defeat of Nazi Germany. Throughout his party and state activities Molotov was always on the side of Lenin and Stalin in their fight against anti-party groups. But we must learn from mistakes of people like Molotov. After the death of Stalin, Molotov and others lost their political vigilance, essentially surrendered power to the class enemy and failed to resist the power-hungry neo-trotskyist Khrushchev group. With hindsight, this shows the huge cost of these errors for the cause of socialism in our country and around the world.
A. Denisyuk
-------------------------------------------------
KOREAN FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION (KFA)
The Korean Friendship Association(KFA) was founded in November 2000 with the purpose of building international ties with the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea.It has several thousand members from 120 different countries.
The KFA has full recognition from the government of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea and is the world-wide leading organisation of its supporters.
The KFA recieves official information from Pyongyang and is in contact with the Korean Committee For Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries and the Korean Commitee For Solidarity with the World People.
The Main Objectives of the KFA are:
Show the reality of the DPR Korea to the world
Defend the independence and socialist construction in the DPR of Korea
Learn from the culture and history of the Korean People
Work for the peaceful unification of the Korean peninsula
Comrade Kim Jong Il leader of the Korean people said
“our Republic has been established and developed as a genuine country of the people, as a Juche-oriented socialist country, the first of its kind in history, and our people, who were oppressed and maltreated for centuries, have become able to enjoy, in the embrace of the Republic, the pride and happiness of a genuine life in which they exercise full rights as masters of the State and society.....
Our Republic, which incorporates the great Juche idea in its State building and State activities, is a people-centered socialist country in which the people are regarded as God, an independent socialist State with a strong Juche character and national identity, and an invincible socialist power that prevails over any enemy, however formidable”
DEFEND THE DPRK!
JOIN THE KOREAN FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION
WWW.KOREA-DPR.COM
EMAIL KOREA@KOREA-DPR.COM OR UK@KOREA-DPR.COM
Supporters of the AUCPB (All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks) can visit the FOR BOLSHEVISM-AUCPB website at http://aucpbenglishwebsite.blogspot.com
Join the online supporters group / discussion forum For BolshevismAUCPB by e-mail at http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/ForBolshevismAUCPB
or email: zabolsh@yahoo.co.uk
Russian AUCPB website address: vkpb.ru
FIGHTING FUND – Comrades and Supporters of the AUCPB and Subscribers to "FOR BOLSHEVISM INSIDE THE COMMUNIST AND WORKERS' MOVEMENT" and other material of the AUCPB, please make a donation towards the further publication of AUCPB material translated into English from Russian by sending donations to our fighting fund account "FOR SOLIDARITY WITH WORKERS OF THE EX-USSR" sort code 30-93-60, Account Number: 02312361 (Lloyds TSB).
Many thanks to all our comrades and supporters for their material support!
